Premartial sex is sin-Premarital sex — What does the Bible say?

In a recent thread on Facebook, Dr. Jerry Walls posted a discussion on the topic of premarital sex and the Bible. As expected, it got a lot of attention, but the comments that followed revealed a lack of understanding in the way of biblical marriage. The responses here from professors of Biblical Studies provide some important notes on the biblical texts and their world that serve as as a foundation for a biblical theology of sexuality and marriage. Some are to the point while others provide rich contextual insight into the texts that often get attention.

Premartial sex is sin

Premartial sex is sin

It actually got me to laugh. Marrying someone you barely know just to have sex is a horrible decision, yet one that is oddly encouraged over a long courtship of pre-marital sex. Yeah, but you can do that within marriage, too. There are countles Bible verses saying that only mention woman as being devoted to a SINGLE man as long as he lives because he Premartial sex is sin the right Premartial sex is sin her by marrying her and paying for the marriage to her father. But you are at liberty to read into it what you like. This declares human sexuality to be sacred territory. Wasting your 20s and 30s waiting to have sex is simply stupid.

Striped rustic hat. Post navigation

Those people say that Premartial sex is sin is fine to have premarital sex, as long as you are not doing it in a pagan temple. It is true, and important, to recognize, that fornication Fuck rachel not punished as severely as adultery in the OT. Starting in the s, and especially after World Premartjal IIpremarital sex became more common, particularly among women. University Premartial sex is sin Michigan Press. What of I Premartual ? Ever wonder how much crime and deceit comes from misplaced sexual Premarttial that SHALL, not will or may, manifest in other ways? No, God does not bother to flat out say that having sex before marriage is a sin. Is she a widow? My experiences make me a better mate and future husband for my future wife. Sex has over 50 benefits and it is the fountain of youth so do not miss out have as much sex as you can daily.

Talk about dating and the subject of sex is bound to come up.

  • In a recent thread on Facebook, Dr.
  • Premarital sex is sexual activity practiced by people before they are married.
  • Talk about dating and the subject of sex is bound to come up.
  • .

  • .

Growing up in an evangelical church, I was sure premarital sex was the unforgivable sin. In fact, the Bible never says sex before marriage is a sin. It was when my faith deepened and I discovered a God who is genuinely loving. Shame separates us from God, not our actions. Christianity is built on unconditional love, not good morals.

Check out these perspectives from other Christians who have rejected the idea that premarital sex is wrong. What is sexual immorality? Sex before marriage. Why is sex before marriage immoral?

Because the Bible prohibits sexual immorality. Jerry Walls on Seedbed. In an attempt to justify what is believed to be common knowledge, we are pulling at any verse that has an inkling of resemblance to premarital sex. We are using these verses, devoid of their context and circumstance, in order to justify a belief that does not have much merit. He showed this by reversing four of the Old Testament laws which conflicted with loving people. This was a way of thinking that demonized sexuality, not just homosexuality, but anything having to do with sexuality that fell outside the confines of marriage.

Skip to content Growing up in an evangelical church, I was sure premarital sex was the unforgivable sin. Jerry Walls on Seedbed In an attempt to justify what is believed to be common knowledge, we are pulling at any verse that has an inkling of resemblance to premarital sex.

To book Dani for media or speaking, please contact. To book Dani for media or speaking, please contact hi danifankhauser.

But I see in you a beauty that shall not fade away, and in the autumn of your days that beauty shall not be afraid to gaze at itself in the mirror, and it shall not be offended. My urine would start and stop, etc. This article needs additional citations for verification. None of my business as God deals with judging people. As ought to be clear from 1 Cor. By the end of the 20th century, between 75 and 80 percent of Americans had experienced vaginal intercourse before the age of

Premartial sex is sin

Premartial sex is sin

Premartial sex is sin. The Porch Blog

Sex should have no pain at all. We need sexual pleasure not pain. So I just always use water base lube all the time. Also I believe people should schedule sex daily.

Sex is a lot better if you have daily scheduled sex. To me sex is bad or lousy when you do not schedule it daily. You become all out of sync. Daily schedule sex programs the body daily to have sex and the body and mind adjust very good and everyone is a lot happier and marriages work be a lot happier. So I strongly believe in daily schedule sex everyone will be a lot happier in the long run.

Also have as much sex as you can. Sex has over 50 benefits and it is the fountain of youth so do not miss out have as much sex as you can daily.

I would second that. Such an instance demonstrates lack of self control, we are more than just sexual beings. If point 4 is true, why not make her your wife, rather than treat her like a cheap date while you remain noncommittal.

What if they were engaged though? In a similar vein, twisting the scriptures to sell the guise of purity to young folks is wrong. This whole mess is a result of well meaning folks thinking its ok to do a little evil so good may come. By evil, one problem is taking selected scriptures and redefining words far beyond their original definitions such as the above. Marital sexual dysfunction is a real problem for far too many couples who were taught the idolatry of purity in their youth.

This can and does lead to sexual sin within the confines of marriage… and its a catch 22, they know the good they ought to do, but their brain wiring and physiology prohibits them from doing so.

Such brings about divorce in many cases, and in others it can serve as a huge stumbling block causing them to walk away from faith entirely. There are not even rules that require a ceremony, a minister nor a written agreement to establish marriage, certainly not a requirement for any government to issue a license. Pastors and Preachers will NEVER teach this to you, because it would cause the congregation to divide and their salary to stop.

It would cause loan payments to the bank for the church building to go into default. My church does not have a loan payment to make and my pastor still does not teach that per-marital sex is not a sin…you realize that right there that was your whole argument, correct? Not that the church even needs a building to meet. Or Christians. Yeah buildings are nice, but what about house churches, I know several people who attend a house church with nobody receiving salary as a pastor and nobody charging for use of the house or the paper they print the discussion points on.

And no, a marriage did not always require all of those things, but nowadays that is how it is done legally. And scripture does tell us in Romans to submit to the authorities in our lives. That is why we get married with all the legalities and formalities that we do nowadays. Not because that is the only way to go about it, but because the authority in our lives want it that way. Your logic is very flawed. Melissa, I was merely pointing out the traditions that people succumb to.

If you read my link, this subject is argued flawlessly. Leviticus 18 completely defines sexual sins. BTW, there is no requirement by the government for your to get married. If you support government involvement, you are also now condoning gay marriage in many states. Sexual immorality, aka fornication, is definitely mentioned as a sin. It was mentioned 25 times actually.

Leviticus 18 and 20 lay out all the sexual sins in no uncertain detail. Show me anything that remotely defines sex outside marriage as a sin, unless it is combined with sins such as incest, bestiality, adultery, sexual sacrifice as to idols.

If you want to follow what the modern church as invented as sin, that is your business, but no such concept is in the bible. This would be a laughable argument if it were not so deadly in its flawed reasoning! Not every sin named in the Torah required the shedding blood to redress it. For example, lying is a sin Leviticus , but you will not find the Torah specifically telling the Jews to shed blood to redress it.

How do we know they were sins? What of I Cor ? I understand old or less virile men making these rules… but to type so much about sex and how it should be performed is ludicrous. God created the universe. To type up so much about why sex is bad shows me this person feels guilty for his own feelings whether acted upon or not. Why is that? But just as Jesus would do I say minimal words to express my dislike then turn the other cheek and walk away from it.

I make my own personal choices and lead by example. I do not judge nor care if people have premarital sex or are gay. None of my business as God deals with judging people. God personally told me that religion must die in order for humanity to survive. He told me this as a child. I never read the bible and only know of the words in it from those that speak them to me. Just as Jesus was in his day I am shunned as I know I am not a part of any original sin.

There is overwhelming evidence to disprove deceptions in the bible. God does not consider us even for a fraction of a second. We have not proven ourselves worth no different than the animals we have evolved from.

Peace be with you all. In fact this is part of what makes it such a grand law in my view: it covers any conceivable moral wrong-doing. I have also talked to those whom I believed to be knowledgeable about Hebrew and have not found any disagreement on this so far. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love. Matthew clearly teaches us to pray to God as our Father.

In churches and the education that church people have propagated, for a long time people have believed that sex outside marriage has been a biblically forbidden pleasure. Also Romans 13 and James tell us that love is what fulfills the 10 commandment law and if we know the good we should do and fail to do it we sin respectively.

James even says if we have broken one law we have broken all of it which makes most sense if we consider that 10 commandment law an exposition of love. See James I appreciate the time you took to type this up. But in summary assuming the books written are the word of god is the leap of faith I am unwilling to take.

I see them as the false prophet they claim we should not follow. I know there is something binding our conscious energy to the universe but I also know the bible is a false hope presented to create turmoil in the spirit of man. To seek out prematurely signs of our own demise means we take actions to create this. Basic psychology we make decisions based on what we feel. Again I will take time and look up.

This is the King James version of the bible you are referencing correct? It is true I believe that all manner of atrocities have been committed in the name of Christianity but I would not consider those committing these to be Christian for one second! Actually as I said above, I would consider this to be breaking the commandment against taking the name of the LORD in vain. NIV should suffice in getting a good modern translation of the texts though I believe.

Any non-paraphrase could work but the King James Version uses antiquated English so it could make understanding it more difficult. Sorry about my response not being the most straight-forward. My view after analyzing the evidence is that it does not teach this. Anyone believing this should examine their proof-texts in the original language. Blessed is the man who takes refuge in him! Thus any unbeliever is rationally invited to test God if it is an honest experiment—the only time anything bad is said about testing God is when a person was persistently rejecting evidence they already had.

Then marry the unwilling sex partner. God said that is good. It said 50 skekels not days of wages. Regardless, how is that even close to fair punishment for a rapist? Thus you shall purge the evil from among you.

The man alone is punished, not the girl. This is treated as rape and adultery, as the engaged girl was seen as already belonging to another man with the same commitment as a marriage.

Deuteronomy and Exodus are similar. Deuteronomy speaks of rape, Exodus speaks of seduction. In the instances of rape and seduction, he is required to pay the bride-price and make an honest woman of her. In the instance of seduction, the father may refuse possibly in either instance and he must pay anyway. The law states that he may not divorce her, ever, for any reason, but must continue to support her. This is important because the law did permit divorce for sexual immorality, but that no longer applies in this instance.

She may cheat on him all she wants, and he cannot put her away or stop providing for her. Why did they want to stone Mary Magdalene then? Yes, I know, its not the immortal word of God, blah blah blah. I would be surprised if most modern day Christians even know who he is, much less have read his work. More than what little you know of his lifetime. And before you resent me, I will leave you with a quote from the book, when Jesus reveals he knows Mirriam had many lovers:.

For mind you, my friend, I was dead. I was a woman who had divorced her soul. I was living apart from this self which you now see. I belonged to all men, and to none. They called me harlot, and a woman possessed of seven devils. I was cursed, and I was envied. But when His dawn-eyes looked into my eyes all the stars of my night faded away, and I became Miriam, only Miriam, a woman lost to the earth she had known, and finding herself in new places.

Other men love themselves in your nearness. I love you in your self. Other men see a beauty in you that shall fade away sooner than their own years.

But I see in you a beauty that shall not fade away, and in the autumn of your days that beauty shall not be afraid to gaze at itself in the mirror, and it shall not be offended.

If this cypress tree is yours and you would not have me sit in its shadow, I will walk my way. I have incense to burn for you, and a silver basin for your feet. You are a stranger and yet not a stranger. I entreat you, come to my house. Then He stood up and looked at me even as the seasons might look down upon the field, and He smiled. I love you for yourself. Jesus loves the sinner just as much as he hates the sin.

I will not challenge the validity of this quote because you are right in that I know nothing about the book or the author or any of that. But just because Jesus loves past the sin does not mean that it is not still a sin. And of course people had sex in biblical times when they were not supposed to! But do our laws stop people from stealing, from murdering, or from anything else really?

But it does give a basis for when it comes time for judgement day, for the ultimate trials. I personally find it very offensive the way you refer to Jesus Christ as if he is nobody, if you want to suggest a different viewpoint for people to look into then you should probably try to be a bit more respectful about it because nobody wants to listen to somebody who is acting like a know it all jerk. Not that you necessarily are one, but that is how it came off to me.

Sexual Immorality appears to be the following Four 4 : Incest, Male Homosexuality in part but perhaps not in whole i. Fornication would appear to encompass all these too. Rape is listed as a crime, but not sexually immoral unless it violates the above Four 4. Having sex with children is not sexually immoral unless it violates one of the above Four 4 e.

Yet society has placed restrictions on this by placing an age-of-sexual-consent in the pudding. Twosomes, Threesomes, Foursomes, etc. B A single woman could have sex with a married man, a married woman, a single woman, or a single man. But not necessarily at the same time e.

Nor could she have sex with a married man and a married woman at the same time if the married man was not married to the married woman. C A single man could have sex with a single woman. However, a married woman having sex with a married woman alone together may violate the Fornication Clause if both had different husbands not the same husband. See where I am going with this?

I have seen Jewish Charts that make this process of elimination much more visual and thus easy to follow. So are you saying that a Concubine and a Wife are the same thing? My name is Tanya i live in USA were Divorce seems to be the order of the day,i was married to my husband Lawson for 18 years and we were living happily together with our 3 kids and all of a sudden their came this sad moment for the first time in my life i curt my husband having an affair with a lady outside our marriage before this time i have already started noticing strange behavior like he used to spend some time with us, comes home early after work but since he started having an affair with this lady all his love for his wife gone and he now treats me badly and will not always make me happy.

To cut my story short i contacted Priest Ajigar and in just four days after the spell was done my husband left the other lady and withdrew the divorce case all till now my husband is with me and he now treats me well and we are living happily together again all appreciation goes to Priest Ajigar i never could have done this my self, so to whom it may concern if you are finding difficulty in your relationship or having problems in your marriage just contact Priest Ajigar he is Powerful and his spell works perfectly,i am somebody who never believed or heard about spell but i gave it a try with Priest Ajigar and today every thing is working well for me and if you need his help his email is priestajigarspells live.

Priest Ajigar… lol another spinster. The things people do nowadays for money is shameless. Because that sounds an awful lot like covenant and fidelity to me. Not sex. Lawson did not make this distinction.

Otherwise, how is their any difference between a sexual relationship and the relationship between YHWH and the Israelites? There is some very thoughtful exegesis here, and some homework has been done, but man, this is a stretch. Why do you think the Song of Solomon is in the Bible? Am Cannon shelly from Usa, i am sharing about my experience and testimony online in search of a spell caster that will restore my marriage and make me live a happy life.

I was introduced to a spell caster by my neighbor and i contact him. Indeed he is so real and true to his job. High priest can be gotten on highpriestozigididon gmail. Sins are clearly stated in the bible, repeatedly, using clear terms — Idolatry, beastiality, adultery, etc. Yet pre-marital sex is never once mentioned. But it more likely meant sexual immorality such as beastiality, homosexuality, adultery, and other unnatural acts.

God expressly set aside a Commandment to address sex sins, and he only said adultery — not other stuff. Secondly, it seems that some of the laws God passed are totally offensive to us as modern humans, condoning rape, slavery, and women as property. Rules for obtaining and owning slaves too. I doubt many Christian sermons endorse raping teenage women to gain their hand in marriage! You are simply married to the person in the eyes of God, right? Can you divorce the person in the eyes of God?

God made humans. If he wanted us to mate with only one person, he would have coded us differently. But instead men are biologically designed to mate with as many women as possible to ensure offspring from diverse DNA sources. And women are wired to find the strongest more secure mate. So we are designed inconsistent with the teachings in the Bible. Jesus gave two laws, one of which was to love thy neighbor as you love yourself.

So, to reject some of the odd teachings condoning rape, slavery, women as property, etc. It was practical then for reason that it is a good message for the year old crowd today — emotional maturity, financial stability, abortion, societal problems, diseases, etc.

It is well-intended message to control youth, but totally impractical for responsible adults in the modern era of birth control and financial stability and elimination of stigmas. Unlike Biblical times where dating did not exist, women were voiceless property, married in their teens, and had no power or say… modern men and women are waiting until their 20s and 30s to marry.

Women have rights, choices, and votes. Men and women are from very diverse backgrounds, geographies, and have unlimited ranges of viewpoints, interests, hobbies, desires, goals, etc. It is advisable for people to date and court for a period of years before marriage… yet it is totally impractical to expect a intimate dating relationship to remain sex-free for such a duration without creating more problems stemming from sexual frustration, anxiety, and such than what is sought to cure in some idea of sexual purity.

The alternative is an artificially short courtship so they can have sex — a very common practice for young horny Christians. Marrying someone you barely know just to have sex is a horrible decision, yet one that is oddly encouraged over a long courtship of pre-marital sex.

Somehow a ceremony magically makes sex okay, which seems quite puzzling. Also, I cannot imagine the total sexual disappointment to wait an extended period, get married and then have sex for the first time, only to find out your spouse is a complete incompatible disappointment in the bedroom. And not everyone likes or wants or responds to the same activities.

So, why would you tempt this issue of the unknown, given that marriage is the most important decision of your life? Or cheat or get a divorce. In short, pre-marital sex is vaguely eluded to in the Bible but nowhere expressly forbidden to my knowledge keeping in mind the number of times other trivial things are addressed, like plowing fields with oxen and cows, or not cooking a goat in its mothers milk , except in terms of negotiating a higher price when selling a virgin into marriage — a repulsive concept indeed.

It is a generally responsible concept in an era predating birth control, child support payments, and DNA testing to determine the true father. Jesus and others vaguely discuss the wisdom of waiting… And that is generally good and wise principles for young people in any society.

If you are married upon or after sex with that person, in the eyes of God, how can any sex be pre-marital? Much smarter to test drive before you buy…. Excellent point. The Bible expressly states what is sinful — Idolatry, Adultery, Beastiality, etc. This is total emotional nonsense. Practical advice would be that a person should intimately know their future possible mate spiritually, emotionally, mentally, physically AND sexually before marriage to ensure their mutual happiness.

Would be a real bummer to abstain for years only to marry someone who was totally sexually unsatisfying or unsatisfied by you and therefore incompatible, forever unhappy, and be tied by marriage to that person forever, or face divorce, adultery, etc. Talk about awkward and unsatisfying — to be with a totally nervous and inexperienced lover a man who finishes in two seconds or a woman who is in total pain and bleeds all over the bed — neither of which are going to be very much fun.

Yeah, no thanks. You demand things that are mutually exclusive. Sexual intimacy prior to marriage necessarily causes emotional compromise, either heartbreak or hardness of heart.

God is almighty and all knowing. He laid out quite clearly and expressly the rules. Premarital sex was condoned in many places, including taking a virgin and paying her father a fair economic price and then marrying her. Actually, God gave you a test which you just failed. No, God does not bother to flat out say that having sex before marriage is a sin. Because he made it clear where sex is supposed to happen: in marriage. But for the hard of heart, he enumerated most of the ways that it is wrong.

It does not mean that premartial sex lead to marriage. Virginity had very high value and the father was literally selling his daughter to her future husband for much higher price when she was still a virgin.

It simply does not, no matter how much you want to twist it around. All it ment is that a marriage should never be broken apart, because the man and woman became one flesh. There are countles Bible verses saying that only mention woman as being devoted to a SINGLE man as long as he lives because he has the right to her by marrying her and paying for the marriage to her father.

But if her husband dies, she is released from the law regarding the husband Romans A woman is used as an example here for a reason. Where does it say that you should not have pre-martial sex? Good points, Dako. The Catholic Church only said that priests could have one wife before they said that they had to be celibate was about money, not about what God wanted.

The fundies have hijacked sex and have made people feel guilty about it. They even think that masturbation is a sin. I believe that the things written in the Old Testament or any part of the Bible should not be taken out of its context. The OT and NT cultures show that sexual affairs is looked not too highly. When Tamar daughter of David was asked by half brother Amnon in 2 Samuel she responded by telling him to ask their father for her hand in marriage.

But he raped her. The Bible, if you would believe it, is an honest collection of books, since it;s Spirit-inspired, and since God cannot lie just Google it. I also believe that fornication, having sexual intercourse with another married person, should be considered premarital sex because they are not married — they did it outside marriage, which is what premarital sex is essentially all about: pre- meaning before, marital meaning relating to marriage, sex the stuff they do.

David was said to have taken more meaning he had some concubines after he came from Hebron 2 Samuel 5. They were under their law at the time, so whatever the law said that is sinful is sin.

Our age, however, is over that. NT tells us to remain pure and flee from sexual immorality. What I can do is take the values and try to integrate it in my life. Thank you for your humility as well as honesty to admit the complete scope of tradition.

Actually David had about 40 wives and 80 concubines as I recall. Solomon — not to be out done by dad — had about tenfold that number. Poor fellow evidently walked around in a continued frenzy….. Ab — a father of the faith — ALSO had concubines…. Why does he speak of married couples as singular? The NT, in fact, gives absolutely no allowance for polygamy. The OT allowed it reluctantly and had many examples where it caused innumerable problems Abraham with Sarah vs Hagar; Solomon, and so on.

Why was it allowed in the OT? Mostly for the same reason that God allowed things like divorce: our willfully hardened human hearts lead us to create the circumstances that made polygamy one of the few practical ways for women to find economic security.

May I humbly suggest you re-read the rules for eldership again…. Clearly there were Christians that had more than one wife — and they were not eligible for eldership little too active domestic life I expect… That is pure conjecture. You can point to the ills of Sarah and David and the rest. I can point just as fast back to Job and say, God himself restore Job with multiple women.

This argument falls down. To attempt to digress on what is acceptable before marriage would require a definition of marriage. Good luck with that one, in addition to no where is there reference to a marriage license from the State or Caesar and no where is there a model for a Senior Pastor church, yet we sure do like to superimpose our brilliant ideas as mere mortals.

Bible Scholars Respond Seedbed — Is premarital sex a sin? Leading Bible scholars respond…. If a concubine was a wife, she would be called a wife — not a concubine. Secondly, as noted, concubine is a start. Please provide a thoroughly Biblically annotated answer.

This article is awesome. I have never read such wall of rationalization in my life. It actually got me to laugh. You can be sure in its own citation and idolatry is clear. Immorality, if you apply the Mosaics is clear. After all the entire circumcision issue was raised by a church of gentiles. It would be good for you not to eat blood from a strangled animal, etc etc etc………….. I guess church branding was already lowering their standards back then to get mans buy in!

It completely misses I Cor , for example. There is no allowance for pre-marital sex here. Again, please provide chapter and verse that defines marriage. It cracks me up how people want to pick and choose scripture. Why do I care what man thinks? I care what Gods thinks. If you want to invoke Romans 13 and say the license is subject to the higher power, and since every government on planet earth is wayward and corrupt to the gills, one has the argument that seeking the State or Caesars permission has no place.

I would hope those who want to invoke Mosaic law understand that if Soyuz break one you have broken them all. Also, consider monogamy, and the transition from the great biblical characters that had many women, both wives and concubines, as great men of God.

What event in the bible can anyone point to that changed this as acceptable? In history you will find the answer, because nobility was going into villages and taking all of the fine women.

In order to quash upheaval it was ordained by the King one wife. I have no use of governments or mans customs. Provide sound biblical doctrine and do not bend it to fit and I will submit without question. However, no one has made a convincing argument that stands up to scrutiny. Genesis , the first man recorded as taking two wives was a murderer, a descendant of Cain, not the godly line of Seth. This causes strife between Hagar and Sarah. Genesis , Esau already had wives, and took another wife from the tribes of Ishmael, father of the Ishmaelites.

Genesis , Jacob was tricked into marrying more than one wife. Not only that, but sisters, which was commanded against later. This caused trouble between brothers, and favoritism from Jacob. Deuteronomy 17, God tells them He will set up a king, but commands that the king should not take many wives because they would turn his heart away.

Judges 8, Gideon, Judge over Israel, took the earrings of Ishmaelites and turned them into a priestly vestment and set it up as some kind of idol in his city. He also had many wives and seventy sons. Deuteronomy , commandments are given because of favoritism due to multiple wives and firstborn sons of the respective wives. Polygamy does harm.

Monogamy would have prevented much strife and warfare. Do we really NEED it to become a command to realize this? Furthermore, if such a new revelation were to come, would it be accepted? Genesis is not challenged by the practice of multiple wives and concubines as the example set in the garden of Eden predates the practice that began with the murderer Lamech. As many would have us worry about, the world faces population crises in certain areas, compounded with poverty.

This would not likely have been an issue had people since Noah remained monogamous. This is echoed in Matthew , and Ephesians Important enough to be spoken 3 times in scripture. Deuteronomy God speaks against having many wives. While not a specific command pro-monogamy, it advises moderation. While not defining marriage, per se, it identifies monogamy as being a desirable trait for leadership, and indicative of godly men.

This is the example all Christians should follow. I see how your argument rests on the freewill aspect and as similar to Israel leaving the judge governance under Samuel for the monarchy of David, so could be concluded polygamy was allowed to exist as a matter of free will. However, concluding multiple wives is always a bad ending is challenged by Job who had one wife and no concubines where the wife instructed defiance to God. Your ref to gen may not be challenged by multiple wives but is challenged by incest…………first citation.

Moving On: Please define what constitutes marriage between a man and a woman. The subject of this thread is premarital sex. TO be pre or before something should be able to define what it is that it precedes and what is after, in this instance marriage.

If you cant define marriage, by chapter and verse, then how can you make an argument for monogamy when both monogamy and polygamy rest on the common denominator of what is marriage. Yet, the most knowledgeably have failed to clearly define this. Again, Roman 13 as the higher power only holds when a government is not rogue. The highest power is our source.

If this is the case, then what does it mean to be married in the eyes of God, not the eyes of Tom or Josh or your local C3 church, but God, by chapter and verse. Do you not find it odd that God for whatever reason has no prescription for what marriage actually is? Love neighbor as self. Applying Mosiac law is to crucify Yeshhua all over again. Yeah, but you can do that within marriage, too. There are people out there who get married just so they can have sex.

Refer to the Greek for the definition of fornication and stop superimposing your limited understanding of the definition of the word. Ryne — They also do not have answers as to the requirement of having a marriage license, which is no where to be found.

Also the Senior Pastor model is no where to be found. Thank you! How is that impossible? Even for males, sex is not a necessary thing to live, unlike eating, drinking and sleeping. Betrothal was a long process preceding marriage. Sometimes couples would live together under the same roof as an older couple, lasting up to a year or so, not for sex, but to learn their roles and benefit from the guidance and maturity of the older couple.

Marriages were a contract, not only between man and woman, but between the man and her father, also involving possessions and money changing hands. I grew up in a very conservative Christian family — missionaries, in fact. I became one myself for almost ten years.

I also think I had a rather unhealthy attitude towards the opposite sex because of my enforced purity — I blocked off contact and appeared cold and too independent, scary even. Well, in my late thirties, I met someone and it was the most natural thing in the world for us to have sex.

And while we are not married yet, sex is just one part of our expression of love towards one another — a part that would be completely unnatural to put on hold until the date of the ceremony. I think we take the heart of love out of our faith and replace it with rules in too many ways. Sexual repression is not healthy, physically, mentally and spiritually. Probably the biggest factor to help change my thinking, apart from my relationship, is realising how much like property virgin women were in the OT.

These are different days. And the greatest command is to love. What are your beliefs on gay- sex between loving, consenting adults? Can I ask to kindly include Scriptural backing? Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.

Bible Scholars Respond. Share on Facebook. Used by permission. Advent and the Alarms of Our Souls. A New Mission for Advent.

You could have saved yourself a lot of typing. From Inkaboutit4u com Matt is greatly misunderstood by most. Song of Solomon 8 There may be sixty wives, all queens, and eighty concubines and unnumbered virgins available to me. Gare Bear, This is years later, so — it may not be relevant — but marriage does not prevent any of these things.

The Bible and religion is not synonymous. Bible Scholars Respond […]. Thoughtful post. Thanks for the reasonable response. Well stated, Tyler. Inkaboutit4u com Pre-martial sex is NOT fornication at all. I then asked myself, what are the tenants of faith, the tool box so to speak: Reading the Bible, praying, supplicating, fasting, congregating, meditating, helping and the big daddy abstaining. The world needs more people like you. God Bless! I challenge you to show me one tiddle of scripture that calls this foul.

Rinse and Repeat in the comments. Define Biblical marriage and support with chapter and verse please. In all cases it is NOT pre-marital sex at all. Leviticus 18 gives you the complete definition of sexual sins.

From inkaboutit4u com Sex should not hurt, you need to go see a Doctor and ask why sex hurts you. Lee, Leviticus 18 gives you the complete definitions of sexual sins. This is not rape, but consensual adultery. And before you resent me, I will leave you with a quote from the book, when Jesus reveals he knows Mirriam had many lovers: For mind you, my friend, I was dead. That is because there favorite brand of church is making major bank from weddings. Jesus said that a man who takes a second wife commits adultery against his first wife.

I just made a comment. A concubine is a wife. There are several problems with the article you linked Jeff. Look at all the great men of God!

Genesis , Esau becomes the father of the Edomites. Genesis , Joseph was sold into slavery to Ishmaelites, who in turn brought him to Egypt.

Numbers 20, Edomites refuse passage to Moses and the Israelites, and threaten to kill them. But you wanted scriptures about the definition of marriage. Definition of Marriage: Your ref to gen may not be challenged by multiple wives but is challenged by incest…………first citation.

A study that surveyed young adults about their emotional reactions after sexual encounters found that men reported more positive and fewer negative emotional reactions, and both men and women reported that the experience was largely more positive than negative.

In the earlier years of the study, men reported more pleasure and greater anxiety than women, while women reported more feelings of guilt than men. Cohort studies carried out over 23 years found that in later years, women expressed greater pleasure and less guilt.

The differences between emotional reactions among men and women decreased slightly during the 23 years. An international online sex survey compared responses of residents of 37 countries against World Economic Forum figures for gender equality in those countries, finding that countries with high gender equality had respondents report more casual sex, a greater number of sex partners, younger ages for first sex, and greater tolerance of premarital sex.

Different ethnic and cultural groups in America have varied religiosity and sexual attitudes. A study with college participants found that Asians had more conservative sexual attitudes compared to Hispanics and Euro-Americans. Hispanics reported sexual attitudes similar to that of Euro-Americans. Asian, Hispanic, and Euro-American women with high levels of spirituality were found to have a correlation between conservative sexual attitudes and perceived religiosity.

Religiosity and religious fundamentalism predicted conservative sexual attitudes most strongly in Euro-Americans and Asians. Sexual activity among unmarried people who do not have access to information about reproductive health and birth control can increase the rate of teenage pregnancies and contraction of sexually transmitted infections.

The rates of teenage pregnancy vary and range from per girls in some sub-Saharan African countries to 2. The rate for the United States is The cultural acceptability of premarital sex varies between individuals, cultures and time periods.

Western cultures have traditionally been disapproving of it, on occasions forbidding it. In other cultures, such as the Muria people of Madhya Pradesh , sexuality prior to marriage is accepted and at times expected.

Individual views within a given society can vary greatly, with expectations ranging from total abstinence to frequent casual sex.

These views are dependent on the holders' value system , as formed by his or her parents, religion, friends, experiences, and in many cases the media. Economist Jeremy Greenwood , Chp. He argues that singles weigh the cost a potential pregnancy and benefit of premarital sex.

As contraception improved the cost of premarital sexual activity fell. Parents and social institutions also weigh the cost and benefit of socialization. Technological improvement in contraception reduced the benefit of socialization because premarital sexual activity was no longer as risky in terms of unwanted pregnancies, which placed a strain on parents and social institutions.

As a result there was social change. Sex before the public marriage ceremony was normal in the Anglican Church until the Hardwicke Marriage Act of , which for the first time required all marriages in England and Wales occur in their parish church.

The law also applied to Catholics , but Jews and Quakers were exempt. Before its enactment couples lived and slept together after their betrothal or "the spousals", considered a legal marriage. Until the mids it was normal and acceptable for the bride to be pregnant at the nuptials , the later public ceremony for the marriage.

The Marriage Act combined the spousals and nuptials, and by the start of the 19th century social convention prescribed that brides be virgins at marriage. In Britain, births outside marriage were up to During the colonial period, premarital sex was publicly frowned upon but privately condoned to an extent.

Unmarried teenagers were often allowed to spend the night in bed together, though some measures such as bundling were sometimes attempted to prevent sexual intercourse. Even though premarital sex was somewhat condoned, having a child outside wedlock was not.

If a pregnancy resulted from premarital sex, the young couple were expected to marry. Marriage and birth records from the late s reveal that between 30 and 40 percent of New England brides were pregnant before marriage.

The growing popularity of the automobile, and corresponding changes in dating practices, caused premarital sex to become more prevalent. Alfred Kinsey found that American women who became sexually mature during the s were much less likely to be virgins at marriage than those who became mature before World War I.

Sexual interactions between people without plans to marry was considered unacceptable, with betrothal slightly lessening the stigma. However, premarital sex was still frowned upon. Beginning in the s, as premarital sex became more common, the stigma attached to it lessened for many people.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Sexual activity before marriage. It has been suggested that this article be merged with Fornication. Discuss Proposed since June This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.

Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Sexuality portal. PewResearch Global Attitudes Project. Archived from the original PDF on Retrieved July 7, Retrieved July 13, May 22,

Premarital Sex Is Not a Sin - Shameless

In a recent thread on Facebook, Dr. Jerry Walls posted a discussion on the topic of premarital sex and the Bible. As expected, it got a lot of attention, but the comments that followed revealed a lack of understanding in the way of biblical marriage. The responses here from professors of Biblical Studies provide some important notes on the biblical texts and their world that serve as as a foundation for a biblical theology of sexuality and marriage. Some are to the point while others provide rich contextual insight into the texts that often get attention.

Here is how he posed the question:. Everyone talks about it, but I have as of yet been unable to find it. In the Old Testament, sex before marriage leads to marriage Exodus The Bible uses the same word talking about reasons for leaving a marriage, which sex with a woman besides your wife is clearly not premarital sex.

What is sexual immorality? Sex before marriage. Why is sex before marriage immoral? Because the Bible prohibits sexual immorality. As ought to be clear from 1 Cor. In that text she is called both the betrothed and a virgin. In early Jewish law if you had sex with a woman you were considered married to her or you had shamed her.

See the story of Mary and Joseph. Porneia can refer to all sorts of sexual sin including deflowering a virgin. What that whole discussion by your student ignores is: firstly, there was no dating or physical intimacy prior to an arranged marriage in the vast majority of cases. Second, honor and shame cultures placed a high value on sexual purity. Notice how prostitutes were stigmatized. Women were mainly blamed for sexual immorality.

Finally Jesus gave his disciples two choices in Mt. This means no sex outside marriage. What the student fails to observe is that the premise of this legal stipulation is that the man has, in fact, gotten the process reversed. He should have negotiated the bride-price, then married her, then had intercourse. The point of the law, as with many other laws in the Book of the Covenant , is that he has willfully done something wrong and must now make amends.

The text the student is citing in your discussion actually supports your position, and not his. Also, although perhaps not directly related to the question of premarital sex, the single most neglected datum from the OT related to marriage is Gen.

I never thought in my wildest dreams that this text would become controversial in our day, but it elevates the idea of heterogeneous marriage between one male and one female, regardless of how we conceptualize a state-defined and sanctioned certificate of marriage.

The biblical concept is clear enough. This is the origin of the tradition in the Roman Catholic church that a wedding not followed by sexual intercourse, i.

But this proposition is not reversible, that one can have sex and consider oneself married! This is why St. The Bible sees sexual union as the vital core of marriage, but this in no way implies that no concern existed for making sure such a union was lawful, sanctioned and blessed by God. The importance of marriage as a social, spiritual and public covenant or contract is pervasive in the Bible, especially the OT.

The world of the OT was a patriarchal society based on land and agricultural production. In such societies, and definitely in the world of the OT, the title to the land follows the male line of descent. In such cultures it is unthinkable that they would be indifferent to being as certain as possible who the father of a child was. Likewise, a man who sired children outside of marriage created a confusing legal situation regarding land title and inheritance.

Given that in the OT the land was promised to Israel by Yahweh in perpetuity, and that this promise would be negated if through improper marriage or begetting, the land ended up in the wrong hands, the OT writers clearly would not sanction sexual activity except in the confines of a public, exclusive, permanent covenant between the man and woman: marriage.

This reality does not allow us to say that, since we are not a patriarchal and agricultural society, that we may dispense with the importance of a public covenant of marriage. Rather, it rebuts the claim that the OT does not insist on marriage before sex, and it provides the human context out of which the OT demand for faithfulness in marriage and celibacy outside it emerged.

The key point, here, is not just the agricultural or economic one, but the fact that sexual activity exists in a total weave of life, relationships, economics and community.

Marriage recognizes this. Moderns, however, only think of sex individualistically as an act of pleasurable intimacy between the man and woman. They have no notion of sex as an act embedded in the social matrix, economic life, and trans-generational history of their community, to which they are accountable for all their actions. The idea that extramarital sex is fine is only imaginable in the post-sexual revolution world of not just easy contraception and abortion, but a world in which no particular significance for society as a whole attaches to sex.

Thus despite being a sexually saturated society, modern or post-modern life remains starkly devoid of sexual satisfaction.

The nature of marriage as a covenant in the OT uniting a man and woman, in the context of family, community and God, calls for public recognition. Unlike the privatistic piety of contemporary life, biblical faith was communal and public. A covenant in the Bible whether with God or between human parties, always assumes a prior history among the parties, a clear set of expectations in the relationship to be consecrated, and always culminates in a vow which is witnessed by the community.

Given that the NT sees marriage between a man and woman as exactly analogous to the relationship between Yahweh and Israel, and then, Christ and the Church, abruptly withdrawing marriage from the realm of public covenant making rips up the fabric of the biblical revelation. If sex prior to marriage was legitimate, the law certainly would not describe it with a Hebrew term uniformly used for illicit persuasion.

So this was not just a guy and girl or an engaged couple who naturally consummated their relationship on the way to getting married.

Nothing good there. This is why the law also provides for the possibility that her father will not allow the man to marry her, since he evidently does not constitute a suitable mate.

A second point on Exodus is the penalty. Penalties mark violated realms. The man of Exodus has in fact seized a privilege to which he was not legally entitled, took what was not legally his.

He must therefore either marry the woman or, if the wise! Clearly this text has no idea of justifying or legitimizing any kind of sexual intercourse prior to marriage, but is a sanction enforcing marriage as the only setting for sexual union. If one exists I would like to know about it.

It is true, and important, to recognize, that fornication is not punished as severely as adultery in the OT. Even though a less heinous offense, it clearly remains a serious sin. We also rightly assert the futility of works to attain justification, thus all deeds are equally ineffective in securing our salvation. That fact, however, does not in any way imply that there are therefore no degrees of moral offensiveness or harm in different sins.

Scripture and plain reason show that different sinful actions cause differing levels of harm. The very existence of the Ten Commandments, separating out a set of offenses from the other hundreds of laws and prohibitions we find in the Bible, implies gradations of harm and offense.

But why would sexual sin occupy such a central place in biblical ethics? This point is most fundamental: in scripture, sexual identity and conduct is wired directly into the central reality of human existence in the image of God. This declares human sexuality to be sacred territory. Tellingly, Genesis 2 makes no mention of reproduction in connection with human sexuality.

The stress falls entirely on partnership and intimacy. The inspired author then declares the sequence of a man leaving father and mother, clinging to his wife, and the two becoming one flesh.

A survey of the occurrences of this word reveals that, when used of personal relationships, refers to a commitment that forges a relationship that is virtually one of kinship.

It can refer to any such committed personal relationship, whether with other humans or even with Go. To assert that sexual union apart from a public demonstration and pledge of unbreakable loyalty is to make a hash of this central passage in the biblical presentation of marriage.

This is why the Bible treats sexual sin as qualitatively different from other sins. No other sin is regularly used in that way. Not even oppression of the poor, horrible sin that it is, is used as a metaphor for apostasy, but sexual sin is. Most people find Leviticus to be a very lofty moral statement. But it is bracketed both fore and aft with a series of forbidden sexual relations. The point there is that the social and personal integrity called for in Lev is not possible if sexual integrity does not exist.

Sexuality as the strategic entry into the most intimate center of human truthfulness and fidelity. This remark seemed to me emblematic of the whole problem. Sexuality divorced from every other reality than the most obvious ones of attraction and pleasure. Sex is about sitting by the bed wishing you could be the one suffering instead of them. Sex is about still feeling off balance when you have to go without your wedding band for some reason.

Lots of energy, but is it really passion? Lots of smoke, but not a fire to light your life, warm your soul and nourish your heart. The eyes of the goddess are painted, but the eye-holes are empty. The courtesan looks alluring, but the heart is stone-cold. Instead, we get Madonna and Lady Gaga.

And we deserve them. Jerry Walls , Ph. Author, speaker, and professor of Philosophy. Author, speaker, and professor of New Testament and Biblical Studies. Bill Arnold , Ph.

Premartial sex is sin

Premartial sex is sin

Premartial sex is sin